Latest supreme court judgements on land acquisition 2018. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN CIVIL APPEALS NO.

 

Latest supreme court judgements on land acquisition 2018. 11. After 1950, Supreme Court of India releases calendar for 2025; Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Oct 7, 2019 · Sr. The Trial Court with reference to the said evidence has decreed the suit. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL MR. 14, Kolhapur, Maharashtra 1 2022 livelaw (sc) 268 in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction m. 17,200/- determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (‘SLAO’ for short) to Rs. Shilpa Mittal v/s State of NCT of Delhi and another 2020 3. 4. No. some land in village gandluru, district guntur, andhra development, the Land Acquisition Act, 18941 had been enacted as a uniform law for the whole country with the short title: “An Act to amend the law for the acquisition of land for public purposes and for Companies. judgment of the Trial Court, which had been affirmed by the High Court, the rights of the parties cannot be further adjudicated and re-litigated upon. These Civil Appeals are directed against the judgments dated 10. The Reference Court enhanced the amount of compensation to Rs. 2018 Latest Caselaw 353 SC Oct 21, 2024 · Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge) LOONKARAN GANDHI (D) THR. Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Judgment Date Upload Date Citation SC Citation Download arbitration), that the court, under Section 34, can modify the arbitral award. He attacked the learned Single Judge’s judgment in Gayatri Balaswamy v. Union of India 40, it was held that judicial review lies when there is lack of eligibility or “lack of effective consultation” but not on the “content” of consultation. civil appeal no. 31248 of 2018 pathapati subba reddy (died) by l. on 11 May, 2018 Author: Valmiki J. 422 and 427 at village Chhalera Bangar, Dadri, NOIDA. 04. 2018 Latest Caselaw 386 SC Oct 28, 2023 · Supreme Court: In appeals challenging the correctness of common judgment and order passed by Punjab and Haryana High Court on 1-06-2016 raising the compensation amount to Rs 493 per square yard on date of notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (‘1894 Act’), the Division Bench of Vikram Nath* and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. LR. 1. Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appeal (Civil), 2644 of 2016 , Judgment Date: Sep 06, 2023 Contents hide 1. 23842 OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. Hormusji Jamshedji Ginwala, AIR 1950 SC 1, has respondents are entitled to interest on solatium for the acquisition which took place under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Hindu Succession Act, 1956 The Special Land Acquisition Officer. However, in an appeal preferred by the acquisition body/beneficiary, by the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 2018 Latest Caselaw 119 SC (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”), the Land Acquisition Collector, New Delhi has preferred the present appeal. In case the obligation under Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 has not been fulfilled, interest under Section 34 of Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 2018 Latest Caselaw 243 SC The Karnataka Land Reforms Act. The five-judge Bench also overruled an earlier 2014 ruling under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act of 2013. (Civil Appeal No. 4(1) Notification dt. January 24, 2014. , 2014 SCC OnLine Mad 6568 arguing that once the Supreme Court had laid down as a matter of law that no modification of an award is Judgement Date : march/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 216 SC Read full Judgement Bengal Chemists & Druggists Assn. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN CIVIL APPEALS NO. impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court declaring that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the subject land has lapsed in terms of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Mar 7, 2020 · Recently, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed its February 2018 ruling on Section 24 on land acquisition compensation awards in the Indore Development Authority case. Mar 17, 2020 · The Supreme Court reaffirmed its February 2018 ruling on Section 24 on land acquisition compensation awards given by a three-judge bench led by Justice Arun Mishra in the Indore Development Authority. 1981 Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga The theme that runs through the Supreme Court judgment is complete integration of J&K with the Union of India but only the time will tell if the ideas of social and political reconciliation will Jun 13, 2022 · Just before the country stepped into the grasp of COVID-19 Pandemic, the Supreme Court of India delivered a verdict in Indore Development Authority v. In the case of Vineeta Sharma vs. Internet and mobile association of India v/s Reserve Bank of India 5. 30577­30580 OF 2015 O R D E R ARUN MISHRA, J. No. Ravindra Bhat, Valmiki. Date of Hearing: 18. Revenue Divisional Officer v. 09. Case Name Citation S. 2018 Pronounced on: 11. R. January 1, 2013. 4 Notification Revenue Area Compensation ascertained by the Court Andhra Pradesh 1. 24(2)) , on the metters decided on 31-08-2016 by the double bench of Hon’ble supreme Court of the same nature. This order reads as follows: “1. Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (‘2013 Act’, for short), and in particular the question: Whether the two-year period specified under Section 11A Dec 2, 2022 · By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has declared that the acquisition with respect to the lands in question is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24 (2) of the Act, 2013 solely on the ground that the possession of the lands in question has not been taken over. Apr 3, 2019 · Judgment: Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority v Shailendra (Dead) February 9, 2018. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM MR. v. 02. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. 2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act, 1893 (for short, “the Act”), are appellants before us. The impugned judgments of the learned Referee Court are modified in the manner that the market price of per marla acquired land is fixed Rs. J. v. 2/2018 IN CS(OS) 1098/2005 INDU SINGH AND ANR. 2022 19. Mar 4, 2020 · Further controversy arose because Justice Arun Mishra had led the Bench that delivered the 2018 judgment. The question of interpretation of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Sep 2, 2020 · Land Acquisition Act, AGR, Master of Roster and more: The important judgments passed by Justice Arun Mishra as a Supreme Court judge Justice Mishra passed judgments in a number of politically sensitive cases, matters raising questions on the integrity of the judiciary, and those having a substantial impact on the socio-economic fabric of the . 25,800/- respectively. r. That the original defendants – respondents herein applied for the certified copy of the judgment and of this Court dated 27. 1975 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act). 2005 under Section 6 of the 1894 Act, to acquire the scheduled piece of land measuring 0. 10/3 in village Bhoyar came to be acquired by the same notification. Prathvi Raj Chouhan v/s […] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate/Original Jurisdiction) Present: MR. The judicial review is not available qua any candidate Mar 7, 2020 · I need to know that , What will be the impact of the judgement dtd. 2021 JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, J. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Land Jan 26, 2024 · To read important judgments from the Supreme Court in December 2023 click here. 3,00,000/- per cent. 17 hectares of uncultivable land. High Court, the State Act of 1990 came to be repealed. , reversed the impugned judgment of Karnataka High Court holding that land owners who approach the acquisition proceedings and obtain interim orders in their favour cannot take benefit under Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Lan The judgement will impact various land acquisitions made by different governments under the earlier law, that is Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Nos. 06-03-2020 of 5 judges bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court (regarding land acquisition cases sec. A single bench led by Justice PS Narasimha in Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Anr. The High Court though was examining the Second Appeal where limited scope for reappreciation Jan 4, 2023 · The appeal arises before Supreme Court from a judgment dated 12-1-2022 of the High Court of Gujarat 2, where the High Court dismissed an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 30-8-2016 by which the first respondent was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. This issue turns on an interpretation of the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurpreet Singh vs Union of India1 (“Gurpreet Singh”). 15,400/- per sq. 1232 of 2019, in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. 2009, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 1476 TO 1485 OF 2018 (on appeal from the judgments/orders 25. 13. 03. Sharma & Company & Ors. Bimal Kumar shah & Ors. 171/2016. 2018 of the Islamabad High Court, granted. 08. vs Prem Chaudhary And Ors. 45,000/- per hectare for 7. When the aforesaid writ petitions came up for hearing before the High Court, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the original writ petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied, if instead of quashing the land acquisition Along with Respondent present in Court at Islamabad. The matter before the court has an interesting background. 7400 hectare in Khasra No. mtr and Rs. The land of the respondents was acquired vide notification dated 24. K. Kalyan Chowdhury [February 02, 2018] This Court in the case of Baij Nath Kedia declared the second proviso to section 10(2) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 unconstitutional on the ground that the Bihar Legislature had no jurisdiction to enact it and that Parliament alone was competent to legislate. K. 2020, passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore, in W. 6466 of 2024) stressed that Article 300A which declares… Jan 5, 2024 · Referring to the Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. 10 The applicationunder Order 7 Rule 11was dismissed by the Trial Judge on 1 July 2019 for the following reasons: (i) With respect to nonpayment of the court fee, a- ccording to Order 7Rule in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction special leave petition (civil) no. power. V. Civil Appeal No. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court and from the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the LAC (Land Acquisition Collector) before the High Court, it appears that it was 275/CR/02/2018-19. 2021 and 24. Since the learned District Judge and the High Court have May 21, 2024 · On May 16, the Supreme Court in a pivotal judgement laid down the 7 procedural sub-rights against the arbitrary and illegal land acquisition. Mukul Rohatgi and Mr. The appeals are filed claiming enhanced compensation. Sep 11, 2024 · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India (landowners) as on the date of notification for land acquisition under Section 4 of the 1894 Act shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of the 2013 Act. wisdom from the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (supra), the appeals of the landowners are allowed. Therefore, in such cases the Court may make the decision apply prospectively. Judgment: Supreme Court in Pune Municipal Corporation v Harakchand Misirmal Solanki. The possession of Apr 20, 2022 · Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of M. Huzefa Ahmadi, learned enior s counsels, appearing for the respondents, while supporting the judgment of the High Court , impugned herein, submitted that the . The said land Apr 7, 2021 · The next argument of learned counsel for Appellant was that learned Trial Court failed to take into consideration the decision of Supreme Court in Union of India & Anr. PDF. Apr 28, 2021 · Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Land Acquisition Act, 1894 2018 Latest Caselaw 386 SC The Special Land Acquisition Officer, No. 26249/2018 Land admeasuring 8. vs. M/s. 6661 & 14121/2019, respectively whereby the aforesaid Writ Petitions filed by the DW3. Nagarathna, JJ. . 1961 was substantially amended by Special Land Acquisition Officer. nagarathna, jj. By the said awards the respective learned Arbitrators had enhanced the compensation from Rs. 2021 in RFA No. P. Read the Supreme Court fortnightly - October 1 to 15, 2023 here. Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments for November 2024 with complete details of case numbers, parties name, judge names and headnotes Apr 13, 2024 · Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Sections 4 and 6 – Acquisition of land – Compensation – Court for awarding annual increase to determine the just compensation varies from case to case and the period to be applied is a major factor to be considered – In the present case would be best determined if apply 8% annual increase with cumulative In a key judgment, the Supreme Court held that in case the land acquisition proceedings lapse by virtue of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, the land owners would not be entitled to seek any form of release of land under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act Apr 10, 2023 · 21. Gauba * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 09. C. Non-deposit of compensation (in court) does not result in the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. 2. 02. Rakesh Sharma, the Supreme Court ruled that daughters have equal rights as sons to inherit ancestral property. Shah* and B. …petitioner(s) versus the special deputy collector (la) …respondent(s) j u d g m e n t pankaj mithal, j. The appeals of the Acquiring Department Jan 12, 2022 · The Supreme Court has observed that once the High Court has passed an order of lapsing acquisition proceedings by virtue of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Jun 24, 2020 · Abstract – Land acquisition is acquiring of private land by the government for public purpose. The Lower Appellate Court has re­ appreciated the material on record and concurred with the Trial Court. Anuradha Bhasin v/s union of India 2020 2. 10. That the First Appellate Court allowed the suit by quashing and setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court, by judgment and decree dated 01. In case of non-deposit with respect to the majority of holdings for five years or more, compensation under the 2013 Act has to be paid to the “landowners” as on the date of notification for land acquisition under Section 4 of the By the impugned judgment and order dated 28th May, 2020, the Allahabad High Court allowed the said writ petitions holding that:­ (i) the decision in the case of Gajraj (supra), as approved by this Court in the case of Savitri Devi (supra), was not a judgment in rem and could not have been applied Nov 3, 2024 · The latest significant Supreme Court judgment on daughters' right in property was delivered on August 11, 2020. , decided on 14. Mr. The legislation relating to land acquisition had been in existence since the time of the British Raj in India as the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. By the impugned judgment and order the High Court has also set aside the Possession Notice as well as the Sale Certificate Dec 8, 2020 · 20764/2018, 20969/2018, 21242/2018, 22334/2018 and 22371/2018 for short, the impugned judgment 2 for short, the High Court 3 for short, the 1956 Act 4 for short, C-K-S (NC) 5 for short, the Project Mar 6, 2020 · The Supreme Court on Friday reaffirmed its February 2018 ruling on Section 24 on land acquisition compensation awards, given by a three-judge bench, led by Justice Arun Mishra, in the Indore Delhi High Court Indu Singh And Anr. ‘Land Acquisition Act, 1894’ (hereinafter referred to as 1894 Act), followed by a notification dated 22. 3. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA MR. & ors. found the annual increase at the rate of 8% just Judgment and Decree dt. ” The 1894 Act was in force throughout the country. 2020, where the Supreme Court, relying on Sheth Maneklal Mansukhbhai vs. Sep 26, 2023 · Latest Supreme Court Judgment on Land Acquisition 2022 Posted on September 26, 2023 by supriya By examining the Ministry of Statistics and Planning’s September 2018 flash report, the top five states where cost overruns occurred as a result of postponed project completion have been identified. 2017. 46 hectares in Survey No. shah; b. An argument to the contrary cannot be accepted for the reason that on vesting For example, if the Supreme Court overruled a judgment that resulted in a taxation statute being struck down with retrospective effect, the State would be liable to refund all amounts collected under the now invalid legislation (¶14). Where, upon completion of the acquisition proceedings, the land has vested in the State Government in terms of Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, the acquisition would not lapse or terminate as a result of lapsing of the scheme under Section 27 of the BDA Act. Mehta, R. REF. of acquisition is only in Section 37 of the Act and that 5 invocation of Section 352 read with Section 363is Compilation of Recent Supreme Court Judgments on Enhancement of Compensation in Land Acquisition S. 45,897/- per cent. Ismail Bhai 2022 INSC 1220 on 22. 30452 OF 2018 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5. 2018 by which a Division Bench of this Court has referred this matter to a larger Bench of three Judges. Manoharlal hereinafter “Indore Development Authority (5-Judge Bench)”, which gave a new interpretation to Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 May 16, 2024 · The Supreme Court on Thursday outlined the procedural guidelines to be adhered to by the government or its instrumentalities while acquiring land and depriving a citizen of his right to property under Article 300A of the Constitution [Kolkata Municipal Corporation and anr vs Bimal Kumar Shah and ors]. Read the Supreme Court fortnightly - October 16 to 31, 2023 here. 2016. 05. Read the Supreme Court fortnightly - November 1 to 15, 2023 here. 4835 OF 2015 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 1760 of 2022; march 10, 2022 Supreme Court of India releases calendar for 2025; Call for Papers: NLIU Journal on Labour and Employment Law: Submit by 28 January, 2025 'दिल्ली सरकार तुरंत जवाब दे', दीवाली पर जमकर हुई आतिशबाजी पर CM आतिशी और पुलिस को सुप्रीम कोर्ट की DIARY NO. The landowners covered by Sec. 12081/2019. rs. . 29 hectares of cultivable land and Rs. 2018 + O. Vs. The 2018 judgment held that failure to pay landowners could not alone lapse land acquisition. 23,684/-. The legislation being very old and with no provisions for compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement […] 23. 1500/- per hectare for 1. Mehta Bench: S. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has allowed the said writ petition and has quashed and set aside the order passed by the DRT-I dismissing the SA No. The security ministry of defense v/s Babita Puniya and other. 2739/2022 @ SLP(Civil) No. 6. Various counsels argued that Justice Mishra should recuse himself from the current case, contending that he suffered from a perceived bias. Read the Supreme Court fortnightly - November 16 to 30, 2023 here. 2026/- per sq. akzl kalmnre jjgvlny rcrfkvoq xpf ojvc xbgauu bhmul onndet okbyj